本文通过细读以弗所《面包师罢工政令》（Ephesos 231 = IK 12.215），考察罗马行省总督所采取的修辞与意识形态策略，并主张该政令体现了一种可称为“训诫式治理”的风格。相较于克利福德·安藤和迈尔斯·拉凡所辨析、学界较常讨论的普世式（ecumenical）与分化式（divisive）治理风格，训诫式治理以修辞克制、道德劝诫和有意暂缓惩罚为主要特征。本文以面包师这一不可或缺却经常遭受盘剥的劳动群体为中心，将该政令置于罗马行政沟通的广阔传统中考察，并与利巴尼乌斯所记述的四世纪安条克类似事件进行比较。此外，本文结合涉及基础设施与劳动规制的其他总督政令，说明这位元老院总督作出上述修辞选择的具体脉络，并探讨这种沟通方式如何反映帝国意识形态、地方社会期待以及罗马官员精英教养（paideia）所形成的多重压力。最终，训诫式治理呈现为一种务实且体察城邦社会需求的治理策略：它在维护地方共同体凝聚力的同时，也维持了罗马统治的权威。

Chinese-domestic large language models such as Doubao, DeepSeek, and Qwen have become the primary LLM platforms, and have the potential to shape the digital environment for classical scholarship within Chinese digital domains due to their ubiquitousness, low-cost and ease of use. Yet their training data for ancient Greek and Latin philology is sparse relative to frontier Western models that remain regionally inaccessible. This paper reports a format-comparison experiment testing whether, and by what mechanism, the encoding format of a digital edition determines the scholarly quality of AI output when these models are queried about a disputed passage in the so-called Periplus Maris Erythraei §56 (line 537), where the phrase μεστὰ πλοῖα has attracted four competing readings. The paper tests whether, and by what mechanism, the encoding format of a digital edition can lead to good philological reasoning of complex textual phenomena. The study may bear implications for further efficient and AI-primed enrichment of digital editions within the Chinese domain that facilitates research and study of Classical Studies in the European tradition.

近期笔者于国内期刊发表了一篇探讨亚细亚行省总督发布、涉及劳迪凯亚水渠铭刻的文章。外审专家建议应在文后附上译文全文供读者详参，笔者对此深感认同，但由于种种原因，此建议未能于该文中实现。为补此遗憾，笔者将刊译文于本辑《西学研究》，供学术同仁与有兴趣的读者参考。笔者将先回顾学界出版此铭刻的一些情况，然后提供译文。由于笔者仅有像素较低的图像，无法对诸多铭文细节进行仔细比对，也没有实际看过铭文以及其载体，是以笔者仅综合参考《铭文学通报》（Bulletin Épigraphique）、《铭文年鉴》（L'Année épigraphique）、《希腊铭文增补》（Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum）对该铭刻的识读与评注翻译铭文内容，并同时回顾该铭刻的出版历程，以为读者提供一个有关此铭刻学说史的清楚脉络。