Water competition between the food and energy sector is a critical component of the food-energy-water nexus. However, few studies have systematically characterized the geospatial and, especially, the sub-annual variations in such competition and the associated environmental impacts and targeted mitigation opportunities. This study characterizes competing water uses for crop-specific irrigated agriculture and fuel-specific power generation across global major river basins to reveal their resulting impacts on local water scarcity for global population under both current and a warming climate. Under annual (and most seasonal) accounting, almost all basins currently suffering from extremely high water scarcity are dominated by agricultural water consumption (e.g. accommodating 26%–49% of basin-total population across seasons), which are often simultaneously exposed to potentially decreasing seasonal water availability under a 4 °C warming scenario. Only 13%–20% of population are located in basins dominated by seasonal power sector water uses, which are predominantly with low water scarcity. Agriculture sector provides the most basin-specific water mitigation opportunities across mid-latitude basins in all four seasons. Nevertheless, power sector becomes more important in affecting seasonal water scarcity and provides unique seasonal water mitigation opportunities, particularly in basins among higher northern latitudes in winter. This analysis highlights irrigated agriculture is currently and will likely remain the key in global water management for basins facing the severest water scarcity, yet increasing attention on the seasonal and spatial variations in cross-sector water use competition is needed to better identify region- and season- specific mitigation opportunities.

Worldwide efforts to switch away from coal have increased the reliance on natural gas imports for countries with inadequate domestic production. In preparing for potential gas import disruptions, there have been limited attempts to quantify the environmental and human health impacts of different options and incorporate them into decision-making. Here, we analyze the air pollution, human health, carbon emissions, and water consumption impacts under a set of planning strategies to prepare for potentially fully disrupted natural gas imports in China. We find that, with China’s current natural gas storage capacity, compensating for natural gas import disruptions using domestic fossil fuels (with the current average combustion technology) could lead up to 23,300 (95% CI: 22,100–24,500) excess premature deaths from air pollution, along with increased carbon emissions and aggravated water stress. Improving energy efficiency, more progressive electrification and decarbonization, cleaner fossil combustion, and expanding natural gas storage capacity can significantly reduce the number of excess premature deaths and may offer opportunities to reduce negative carbon and water impacts simultaneously. Our results highlight the importance for China to increase the domestic storage capacity in the short term, and more importantly, to promote a clean energy transition to avoid potentially substantial environmental consequences under intensifying geopolitical uncertainties in China. Therefore, mitigating potential negative environmental impacts related to insecure natural gas supply provides additional incentives for China to facilitate a clean and efficient energy system transition.

The Chinese government accelerated the clean residential heating transition in northern China as part of a successful effort to improve regional air quality. Meanwhile, China has committed to carbon neutrality by 2060, making strategic choices for long-term decarbonization of the residential sector necessary. However, the synergies and trade-offs for health and carbon of alternative heating options and associated costs have not been systematically considered. Here we investigate air-quality– health–carbon interdependencies as well as household costs of using electricity (heat pumps or resistance heaters), gas or clean coal for residential heating for individual provinces across northern China. We find substantial air-quality and health benefits, varied carbon emissions and increased heating costs across clean heating options. With the 2015 power mix, gas heaters offer the largest health–carbon co-benefits, while resistance heaters lead to health–carbon trade-offs. As the power grid decarbonizes, by 2030 heat pumps achieve the largest health–carbon synergies of the options we analysed. Despite high capital costs, heat pumps generally have the lowest operating costs and thus are competitive for long-term use. With increased subsidies on the purchase of heat pumps, the government can facilitate further air-quality improvements and carbon mitigation in the clean heating transition.