Gu J.
Did supply chain digitization contribute to corporate green energy innovation? The mediating role of asset receivable management and policy spillovers. Energy Economics [Internet]. 2025;000(000):108274.
访问链接AbstractIn the context of supply chain digitization and green development in full swing, it is crucial to clarify the impact of the former on green energy innovation. Using exogenous shocks deriving from supply chain innovation and application pilot events, this study examines the impact of supply chain digitization on green energy innovation based on the data of Chinese listed companies from 2012 to 2021. The findings show that supply chain digitization significantly enhances corporate green energy innovation and that receivable asset management is a path mechanism for supply chain digitization to drive green energy innovation. Moreover, there is a significant positive intra-city spillover. Supply chain digitization contributes significantly to corporate green energy innovation in state-controlled manufacturing firms with effective internal controls in the eastern region. This study has important policy implications for promoting green energy innovation and accelerating the development of modern supply chain systems.
Gu J.
An Investigation of the Impact of Cultural Distanceon the Digital Economy in China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy [Internet]. 2025;000:1-26.
访问链接AbstractThe digital economy has become a driving force for global economic development, resulting in high demand for balanced regional development. Using surname distance as a proxy variable for cultural distance, this study examined the impact of cultural differences on the development of a regional digital economy. The results of the analysis of panel data from 31 Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2019 indicated that the development of a region's digital economy positively contributes to the development of the digital economy in areas of cultural proximity. Further analysis of the mechanisms of cultural differences in the digital economy showed that cultural distance affects the development of the digital economy in a province through three mechanisms: birth rate, divorce rate, and the share of small families. Moreover, the findings suggest regional, divorce, and demographic heterogeneity in the impact of cultural distance on the digital economy.