科研成果 by Type: Conference Paper

China's “the Belt and Road Initiative" is a grand vision to promote the collaboration between Asia and Europe mainland countries along the belt and road. Its implementation will promote the further deepening and improving collaboration of China with ASEAN countries. However, the lack of strategic trust between the two sides of the collaboration, and faced with cultural conflicts and other issues. How to promote collaboration between the two sides to break through the bottleneck and implement this initiative? In the past 30 years, ASEAN countries civil society especially non-governmental organizations (NGOs) has grown and produced more and more influence on national governance, and participate in the management and decision-making of ASEAN in the form of Third Track Diplomacy. When both the first and the second track diplomacy failed, focus on the third track, develop and grow with ASEAN countries in collaboration with our non-governmental organizations, will be a breakthrough and an important dynamic that may push the implementation of “the Belt and Road Initiative".

This paper presents a highly power efficient amplifier. By stacking inverters and splitting the capacitor feedback network, the proposed amplifier achieves 6-time current reuse, thereby significantly boosting gm and lowering noise but without increasing power. A novel biasing scheme is devised to ensure robust operation under 1V supply. A prototype in 180nm CMOS has 5.5uV rms noise within 10kHz BW while consuming only 0.25uW, leading to a noise efficiency factor (NEF) of 1.07, which is the best among reported amplifiers.

This paper studies the high priests found in inscriptions from Amastris concerning the Koinon of the Cities in Pontus (henceforth “the Koinon”), commonly recognized as an assembly of cities in coastal Paphlagonia (Marek 2003, Vitale 2012; contra Loriot 2006).  The Amastrian high priests (7 in total) comprise of three types: 1) ἀρχιερεὺς τοῦ Πόντοῦ, which can be securely associated with the Koinon; 2) ἀρχιερεύς, without specific designation as to what sort of imperial or local cult it was in charge; 3) ὁ τοῦ ἐπουρανίου Θεοῦ Σεβαστοῦ ἀρχ[ιερεὺς διὰ βίου, which also has the Latin equivalent Divi Aug. perpetuus sacerdos inscribed together as a bilingual text.  Should all three types titles be interpreted as the same office? Christian Marek (2003) assumed that they were: he included 2) and 3) under 1), without clarification. Xavier Loriot (2006) assumed differently: in his tabulation of dignitaries of Pontus, he omitted the office holders of 2) and 3), and he also did not state his rationale.  The discrepancy is significant because of dating. Time-reckoning markers on inscriptions of 2) and 3) help date the former to 62 CE, and the latter c. 50 CE, all considerably earlier than the earliest inscription in 1), which is Trajanic. The problem, on the other hand, is that Marek’s inclusion of 2) and 3) may be wrong: Frija (2012) demonstrated that when a high priesthood was not specified, they could be instead high priests of the municipal imperial cult.  This paper considers the possibility that 2) and 3) may have been local/municipal office(s), and could have been the precursor to the High Priesthood of Pontus. Particular emphasis will be on the bilingual text of 3), which contain the surprising attribution ἐπουρανίος, commonly associated with Zeus or Theos Hypsistos and without a Latin equivalent.