<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Su, Xiangyan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shrestha, Nawal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xu, Xiaoting</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denis Sandanov</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, Qinggang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, Siyang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitrov, Dimitar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, Zhiheng</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phylogenetic conservatism and biogeographic affinity influence woody plant species richness–climate relationships in eastern Eurasia</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EcographyEcographyEcography</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecography</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">angiosperms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">diversification rates</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">evolutionary history</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">glacial period</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">glacial-interglacial climate change</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">global patterns</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">latitudinal diversity gradient</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">moist forests</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">niche conservatism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">phylogenetic signal</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">species richness patterns</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tropical and temperate affinities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">winter coldness</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Apr 16</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1027-1040</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0906-7590</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mechanisms underlying species richness patterns remain a central yet controversial issue in biology. Climate has been regarded as a major determinant of species richness. However, the relative influences of different evolutionary processes, (i.e. niche conservatism, diversification rate and time for speciation) on species richness–climate relationships remain to be tested. Here, using newly compiled distribution maps for 11 422 woody plant species in eastern Eurasia, we estimated species richness patterns for all species and for families with tropical and temperate affinities separately, and explored the phylogenetic signals in species richness patterns of different families and their relationships with contemporary climate and climate change since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). We further compared the effects of niche conservatism (represented by contemporary-ancestral climatic niches differences), diversification rate and time for speciation (represented by family age) on variation in the slopes of species richness–climate relationships. We found that winter coldness was the best predictor for species richness patterns of most tropical families while Quaternary climate change was the best predictor for those of most temperate families. Species richness patterns of closely-related families were more similar than those of distantly-related families within eudicots, and significant phylogenetic signals characterized the slopes of species richness–climate relationships across all angiosperm families. Contemporary-ancestral climatic niche differences dominated variation in the relationships between family-level species richness and most climate variables. Our results indicate significant phylogenetic conservatism in family-level species richness patterns and their relationships with contemporary climate within eudicots. These findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying large-scale species richness patterns and suggest that ancestral climatic niche may influence the evolution of species richness–climate relationships in plants through niche conservatism.</style></abstract><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ISI:000526562100001</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Le2ojTimes Cited:0Cited References Count:103</style></notes><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1027</style></section><auth-address><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peking Univ, Coll Urban &amp;amp; Environm Sci, Inst Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Coll Urban &amp;amp; Environm Sci, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaLanzhou Univ, Inst Innovat Ecol, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R ChinaSichuan Univ, Coll Life Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Bioresource &amp;amp; Ecoenvironm, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R ChinaChina Agr Univ, Dept Ecol &amp;amp; Ecol Engn, Coll Resources &amp;amp; Environm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaChina Agr Univ, Key Lab Biodiversio &amp;amp; Organ Farming Beijing City, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaRussian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Gen &amp;amp; Expt Biol, Ulan Ude, RussiaUniv Bergen, Univ Museum Bergen, Dept Nat Hist, Bergen, NorwayUniv Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut &amp;amp; Climate, GLOBE Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark</style></auth-address></record></records></xml>