@article {40552,
	title = {Discovering tacit intellectual traditions in epistemology and ontology: An East-West philosophical comparison},
	journal = {Educational Philosophy and Theory},
	year = {2026},
	abstract = {Although the term {\textquoteleft}intellectual tradition{\textquoteright} is frequently used, it is rarely clearly defined, leaving a vast and largely unknown space for multidimensional inquiry. This article explores how to find tacit intellectual traditions by drawing upon cross-cultural philosophical resources and proposing possible methodological directions for educational research. The main argument is that intellectual traditions can be tacit at both epistemological and ontological levels. Three Western theorists{\textemdash}Edward Shils, Michael Polanyi, and Michael Oakeshott{\textemdash}critically reflect on anti-traditionalism and objectivism since the Enlightenment. They contend that intellectual traditions, including the tradition of science, as tacit knowledge, play an important role in human knowing and action. Chinese philosophy also attaches great importance to the tacit dimensions of intellectual tradition particularly at the ontological level, as exemplified by the core concept of {\textquoteleft}Dao{\textquoteright}. As a foundational assumption underlying the worldview \&nbsp;in ancient China,\&nbsp;Dao\&nbsp;generated different ways of knowing in Confucianism, Daoism, and Zen Buddhism. Even today, it continues to shape how Chinese people interpret and transmit traditions. The philosophical comparison between East and West reveals the complexities inherent in intellectual traditions, which bring new opportunities for educational research. Incorporating diverse tacit intellectual traditions can help researchers better understand cross-cultural educational issues in teaching, learning, and research. For this purpose, we propose ethnoepistemology, ontography, and hermeneutics as potential methodological tools.},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2026.2653159},
	author = {Y. Zhu},
	editor = {R. Yang}
}
