@article {41128,
	title = {[Anesthesia in reoperations in abdominal surgery].},
	journal = {Ann Anesthesiol Fr},
	volume = {16},
	year = {1975},
	month = {1975 Jul},
	pages = {241-51},
	abstract = {Fifty one patients from different surgical units, hence anesthetized by different anaesthesists, underwent reinterventions in abdominal surgery. The indications for the first intervention essentially involved the supra-mesocolic region of the abdomen (62 out of 100 cases). The operative risk during the first intervention was on the average 18 pour cent. The protocol of the first anaesthesia which was known in 42 cases, was of the narco-ataralgestic type. The date of the return to the operation table varied from 1 to 60 days. The state of the patients was in general catastrophic (organic renal failure, acute respiratory failure). Here again the anaesthesia was of the narco-ataralgesic type but the choice of drugs varied depending on the patients\&$\#$039; state. However non significant difference was noted in the average hourly drug consumption between the two interventions. Apart from one circulatory arrest during induction, in one patient with hemorrhagic shock, no death was attributable to the anesthetic technique. The authors, using these findings, attempt to pick out a practical line of behaviour.},
	keywords = {Abdomen, Adult, Aged, Anesthesia, General, Atropine, Chlorprothixene, Dextromoramide, Diazepam, Droperidol, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Meperidine, Methods, Middle Aged, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Phenoperidine, Phenothiazines, Postoperative Complications, Preanesthetic Medication, Pregnanediones, Thiopental, Time Factors},
	issn = {0003-4061},
	author = {Kienlen, J and Arnefaux, J and Brabet, L and Dupont, M H and Grolleau, D and Guilhot, R and Laurent, S and Sube, J and Vernette, M and Wintrebert, P and du Cailar, J}
}
