<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">朱德熙</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">裘锡圭</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">战国文字研究(六种)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">考古学报</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">战国文字;说文;铭文;古文字;金文;左传;简文;形体;古玺文;信阳</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1972</style></year></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73-89</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">侯属载书&quot;麻夷非是&quot;解侯马载书誓辞结尾云:&quot;(?)(吾)君其明(?)(氐见)之,麻(?)(夷)非是。&quot;沁阳载书甲一亦有&quot;麻夷非是&quot;之语,又甲二背面有&quot;□非氏&quot;三字,当是同类语之残文。《东周盟誓与出土载书》认为&quot;麻夷即灭:《方言》十三日‘摩,灭也,《广雅·释诂》曰‘夷,灭也’&quot;,又指出古是、氏通用,载书是字当读为姓氏之氏,凡此都是正确的。但文中释非为我,则不可从。案载书此字形体与金文非字全同,决为非字无疑。</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>