<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">裘锡圭</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">说“建之以常无有”</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">复旦学报(社会科学版)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">《庄子·天下》;“建之以常无有”;关尹;老聃;宇宙生成论</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-3+11</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0257-0289</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">《庄子·天下》篇讲&quot;关尹、老聃&quot;之学时,有&quot;建之以常无有&quot;一语,&quot;常无有&quot;之义自来不得确解。本文认为&quot;常无有&quot;本当作&quot;恒无有&quot;,并根据楚简中&quot;亙&quot;字每可用如&quot;亟&quot;字的现象,推测在《天下》篇较原始的本子中此三字本作&quot;亙无有&quot;,&quot;亙&quot;本应读为&quot;极&quot;,但被后人误读为&quot;恒&quot;(已有学者指出,《庄子·天地》篇中就有&quot;未始有极&quot;被误读为&quot;未始有恒&quot;之例)。上博简《亙先》篇的&quot;亙&quot;字亦应读为&quot;极&quot;。此篇首句为&quot;亙(极)先无有&quot;,&quot;极先&quot;与&quot;太始&quot;、&quot;太初&quot;同意,在篇中还被简称为&quot;极&quot;。《天下》篇的&quot;极无有&quot;即是《亙先》篇的&quot;极先无有&quot;,与《庄子·天地》所说的&quot;泰(太)初有无,无有无名&quot;同意。</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>