<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ching-Yuan Wu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&quot;Of Wellbing or Savior? Emending the Herennia Announcement</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The East Asian Journal of Classical Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://teajcs.com/2022/10/16/of-wellbeing-or-savior-emending-the-herennia-announcement/</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-28</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper discusses a widely accepted emendation to an earlier version of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;IG&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;X 2.1 137. Early draft copies of the Herennia announcement show that Antoninus Pius was hailed as Σωτήρ by the city of Thessalonike, a rare epithet for this emperor. This reading was later replaced due to an expert’s claim that σωτῆρος has to be read σωτηρίας. Since this seems to conform to a well-known salutary formula, the emendation was adopted from then on. This paper suggests that the reading of σωτῆρος is based on reliable and published reports instead, and ought to be preferred over the expert claim. Empirical evidence is given to support reading σωτῆρος.&amp;nbsp;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>