@article {SHEESLEY20079050,
	title = {Sensitivity of molecular marker-based CMB models to biomass burning source profiles},
	journal = {Atmospheric Environment},
	volume = {41},
	number = {39},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {9050 - 9063},
	abstract = {To assess the contribution of sources to fine particulate organic carbon (OC) at four sites in North Carolina, USA, a molecular marker chemical mass balance model (MM-CMB) was used to quantify seasonal contributions for 2 years. The biomass burning contribution at these sites was found to be 30{\textendash}50\% of the annual OC concentration. In order to provide a better understanding of the uncertainty in MM-CMB model results, a biomass burning profile sensitivity test was performed on the 18 seasonal composites. The results using reconstructed emission profiles based on published profiles compared well, while model results using a single source test profile resulted in biomass burning contributions that were more variable. The biomass burning contribution calculated using an average regional profile of fireplace emissions from five southeastern tree species also compared well with an average profile of open burning of pine-dominated forest from Georgia. The standard deviation of the results using different source profiles was a little over 30\% of the annual average biomass contributions. Because the biomass burning contribution accounted for 30{\textendash}50\% of the OC at these sites, the choice of profile also impacted the motor vehicle source attribution due to the common emission of elemental carbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The total mobile organic carbon contribution was less effected by the biomass burning profile than the relative contributions from gasoline and diesel engines.},
	keywords = {CMB},
	issn = {1352-2310},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.011},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231007007005},
	author = {Rebecca J. Sheesley and James J.* Schauer and Mei* Zheng and Bo Wang}
}
