@booklet {4168,
	title = {老子哲学中{\textquotedblleft}道{\textquotedblright}和{\textquotedblleft}有{\textquotedblright}、{\textquotedblleft}无{\textquotedblright}的关系试探},
	journal = {哲学研究},
	year = {1991},
	pages = {38-45},
	abstract = {{\textquotedblleft}道{\textquotedblright}、{\textquotedblleft}有{\textquotedblright}和{\textquotedblleft}无{\textquotedblright}是老子哲学中几个最根本的范畴,这是古今学者公认的说法。《庄子{\textperiodcentered}天下》篇谓老聃{\textquotedblleft}建之以常、无、有,主之以太一{\textquotedblright},其中{\textquotedblleft}太一{\textquotedblright}即指道而言;冯友兰先生说:{\textquotedblleft}《老子》的宇宙观当中,有三个主要的范畴:道,有,无。{\textquotedblright}(《中国哲学史新编》第2册,人民出版社1984年版,第44页)然而,在道、有和无的关系问题上,古今的学者们却存在着很大的分歧。就现代学者而论,主要有以下几种不同的看法:},
	keywords = {归根复命;老子哲学;无名;中华书局;循环运动;中国哲学史新编;冯友兰先生;宇宙观;现代学者;马王堆帛书},
	isbn = {1000-0216},
	author = {王博}
}
